Problem #3

Is Fraïssé's Conjecture Provable in ATR₀?

Open!!High impact — resolution would likely be publishable in a top journal (Advances-level or above)

Fraïssé's Conjecture (proved by Laver in 1971) states that the class of countable linear orders is well-quasi-ordered under embeddability: there is no infinite strictly descending sequence and no infinite antichain of countable linear orders under embeddability. Working in the framework of reverse mathematics, it is known that

RCA0Fraı¨sseˊ’s ConjectureATR0,\mathsf{RCA_0} \vdash \text{Fraïssé's Conjecture} \rightarrow \mathsf{ATR_0},

and it is known that Π21-CA0\mathsf{\Pi^1_2\text{-}CA_0} proves Fraïssé's Conjecture. The open question is whether this gap can be closed on the lower end: does

ATR0Fraı¨sseˊ’s Conjecture?\mathsf{ATR_0} \vdash \text{Fraïssé's Conjecture}?

A positive answer would place Fraïssé's Conjecture exactly at the level of ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0}, matching the usual pattern in reverse mathematics where a theorem is shown equivalent to one of the standard "Big Five" subsystems.

Reference for the problem statement

Antonio Montalbán, Fraïssé's conjecture in Π¹₂-comprehension, 2017

Definitions

  • Well-quasi-order (WQO): a quasi-order with no infinite strictly descending sequence and no infinite antichain (set of pairwise incomparable elements).
  • ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0}: the subsystem of second-order arithmetic axiomatizing arithmetical transfinite recursion — roughly, the ability to iterate arithmetical comprehension along any well-order. One of the "Big Five" reference subsystems in reverse mathematics.
  • Π21-CA0\mathsf{\Pi^1_2\text{-}CA_0}: the subsystem with comprehension for Π21\Pi^1_2 formulas, substantially stronger than ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0}.

Known Partial Results

  • RCA0\mathsf{RCA_0} proves that Fraïssé's Conjecture implies ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0}, so ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0} is a necessary lower bound.
  • Montalbán showed that Π21-CA0\mathsf{\Pi^1_2\text{-}CA_0} suffices to prove Fraïssé's Conjecture, improving on earlier, weaker upper bounds.
  • Whether ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0} itself already suffices — which would pin down the exact strength of the theorem — remains open.

Notes

This is a natural test case for the general phenomenon, well documented in reverse mathematics, that theorems about well-quasi-orderings tend to be very strong — often stronger than ATR0\mathsf{ATR_0} — while this particular case (linear orders) sits right at the boundary where the exact strength is not yet pinned down.

Additional References

  • Laver, R. "On Fraïssé's order type conjecture." Annals of Mathematics, 1971 (the original proof of the conjecture).
  • Montalbán, A. "Fraïssé's conjecture in Π21\Pi^1_2-comprehension." (2017) — establishes the current best known upper bound and discusses the remaining gap.
  • Simpson, S. "Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic." Cambridge University Press, 2009 (general background on the Big Five and reverse mathematics).

Comments

Loading comments…